Couple of day ago, I was watching my daily dose of world news with Charlie Gibson on ABC. They ran a small piece on a town in China, where a school building collapsed during the recent earthquake killing almost all the students in the building at the time. Since the Chinese dictatorship has been steadfastly following the 1 child programme for years, most parents lost their only kid in that building mishap. The images and the story of these disconsolate parents were really heart wrenching. With most parents not in a position to have kids again or too distraught to even think of raising another family, this village had surely lost a complete generation.
This got me revisiting my old idea of humans controlling the nature. Its hard to believe that we can build unmanned instruments that land on the moon, robots which can conduct an orchestra, cell phone service which lets you talk to anyone anytime in any corner of the world, but yet fall short in understanding this natural phenomena. Is it just unfathomable or are we not trying hard enough? How difficult would it be to predict the next earthquake or the next Tsunami? After all these events are not uncontrollable natural things like the rotation of the earth or the explosion of a star.
Technology is often driven by government policies and funding, and not always by people's necessity. For example, we can easily clone a sheep or a dog. Now, had the government and other organizations not vehemently protested, we would have had human clones walking around us by now. Stem cells would have let us grow artificial meat and completely eliminate corporate farming of animals. Sometimes I think that lack of funding and strong regulations is one reason why we don't have great disaster management technology? Unlike cellphone, aeroplanes, automobiles or entertainment this would not be a profit begetting venture for any corporation. This technology has to be completely bred and developed by a strong willed cash rich visionary government.
The magnitude of the Chinese earthquake was so huge that it was easy for the media and people to forget another major catastrophe which happened in the same part of the world - cyclone Nargis in Burma. This cyclone managed to permanently change the southern Burmese coastline and alter the lives of most families living in that neighborhood. 15000+ people lost their lives, and thousands lost their families. But the heartless military rule refuses aid from other countries and worse, maintains its visa restrictions and impedes rescue workers from entering the country. Is this ego of the ruling leaders or is it just a fear of letting the outside world an inside view of the administration's atrocities ?. Either ways, its pitiable to see that innocent lives are lost due to a governments stubbornness to stick to its guns.
Lastly, the US media sucks as usual in its coverage of the world events. After dismissing Fox as a republican mouthpiece, I used to trust only CNN for my daily dose of news. But in a country where Hillary Clinton's inability to operate a coffee machine and the American idol results are the biggest headliners, a loss of 50,000 lives is not big enough to merit 2 days of headline news coverage. Independent media is necessary to criticize the government and give a fair and balanced news. But one can only expect so much from corporate run news networks pandering to a market which thinks the world only consists of 48 contiguous states!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
nicely written! couldn't agree more on the US news channel part. very true!
What do you mean profit? Don't the countries loose billions of dollars worth ? don't buisnesses loose a great deal by the coastal affairs? May be they are really hard to predict...or may be the occur at a relatively rare scale? i think you are basing arguments you heard from somewhere..i have a feeling you do that all the time..especially after you told me no seatbelts in vermont!! dog
sorry..it should be don't countries not the countries :)..and there is some error in the first line of your post..
@Hrishi...thanks...how abt ABC7 Eyewitness ??
@Totti..No seatbelts in New Hampshire not Vermont!! We all here arguements opinions elsewhere and then generate our own views...if thats not true, then you are living on some other planet:)..Whats the error?
I am not sure if you have NPR in Houston - thats the only radio channel I found to have a sort of world view of events in the US...
Listen to the news if you have it there...
Haven't checked their website much..
Couple of days ago..and not couple of day ago..and nice flip you did over the vermont thing :p..also check
http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?forumID=4807&edition=2&ttl=20080525160101
http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?forumID=4807&edition=2&ttl=20080525160101
@Subbu..I used to listen to NPR sometimes in LA..they r pretty good..sometimes too left leaning, but they cover a lot of news
@Totti..Pls post the correct URL..
Well there are always vested interests when it comes to any kind of spending.. maybe we will also go extinct while watching american idol or the news show reporting it..
Awesome piece man! Very relevant. I would recommend reading a book by Al Gore called "The Assault on Reason" that briefly talks about the partisan nature of media coverage.. Its #1 on the NYTimes BestSeller List now.
Alos, I am planning on starting my own blog pretty soon, especially to cover my Ghana trip this summer. Can you help me out later some time on how to go about it? Thanks dude!
@SS..Vested in this country is deep rooted thanks to lobbying...its difficult to get rid of that
@Ronnie..I haven't read Gore's book..will try to get hold of it..
U shld definitely blog abt Ghana...just go to blogger.com..its very simple to build one..they have lotsa templates to choose from...
Post a Comment